|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
167
   |
Posted - 2011.11.28 13:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
14 day still planned.. just in case.  |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
167
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 14:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Paradox wrote:Reteris wrote:Crucible Question:
As far as the new Capt Qtr. go, is the factional qtrs. based on my character or is it based on the faction that owns the station?
For example, I'm Caldari. If I dock to an Amarr station, would I get an Amarr CQ because of the station or would I still receive my Caldari-based CQ?
Thanks, Based on the faction that owns the station Reteris. So if you are of the Amarr race, docking into a Caldari Navy station; you will be in Caldari CQ. Also, the CQ in empire space are cleaner than those in nullsec 
I want a pleasure hub.
bring that back and I'll load the CQ every time. |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
167
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 14:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Quote:Hail has had its falloff penalty removed completely. Wasn't this supposed to be changed to 25%?
you are right, it was not supposed to have such a huge buff. This won't be good. |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
167
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Archetype 66 wrote:SURPRISE....  "Launching a warp disrupt probe should will give you aggression and prevent you from docking or jumping."
yep I noticed that as well... no more bubblejumps |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
167
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 15:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Archetype 66 wrote:SURPRISE 2 :
"When a jump portal is active on a ship it cannot receive remote assistance. This is now clearly shown on attributes."
portal as in cyno, or bridge?
Does this mean a cyno can't have reps put on it, or is this for a BO/titan bridging people through?
|
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
167
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 16:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Archetype 66 wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Archetype 66 wrote:Archetype 66 wrote:SURPRISE.... "Launching a warp disrupt probe should will give you aggression and prevent you from docking or jumping." Also : Should or Will  I know, my english is terribad but... Will. It has now been fixed. :) Does it aggress all ships within the buble ? It would be awesome :)
That would be so unbelievably gamebreaking I wouldn't even know where to start |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
169
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 20:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
I posted this elsewhere, but
I'm ok with dictor probes causing agression. However, I want that probe counted on a KM if I don't get a shot in before I'm primaried.
It's bad enough I spend 60m to be a hero, at least give me credit. |
Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum
Morsus Mihi
170
|
Posted - 2011.11.28 20:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
IainG10 wrote:Dear CCP
The Naga as another hybrid platform?! Why?! We've already lost the destroyer and the tier 3 battleship to bloody guns; why the tier 3 BC as well? Caldari are about missiles; if you want hybrids cross-train Gallente. And if the Caldari REALLY need a hybrid platform, the Ferox is feeling rather under-loved (though that may change with the hybrid changes).
tl:dr
Give the Naga back its torps; cruises as well would be nice (after they were removed from bombers).
/rant off
Go read the threadnought in the test server.
1) Torp naga sucked. Range was too short, flight time invalidated DPS (other ships can get in several volleys before your first missiles hit). Cruise would have the same issues, but also would need to incur a penalty to match the tracking weakness of the other BCs.
2) top tier caldari ships are rail platforms (merlin, moa, naga, rokh) |
|
|
| |
|